SB 684 · Housing Laws Navigator
Bills · 2023-2024 Session

SB 684

Land use: streamlined approval processes: development projects of 10 or fewer residential units on urban lots under 5 acres.Ch. 783, Stats. 2023 · chaptered 2023-10-11 · Current law

Key provisions · Claude summary of the digest, not bill text

Required ministerial approval of subdivisions and housing projects of 10 or fewer units on multifamily-zoned urban lots of 5 acres or less, with 60-day deemed-approved timelines, operative July 1, 2024.

  • Ministerial subdivisions. Required ministerial consideration, without discretionary review or hearing, of parcel or tentative and final maps creating 10 or fewer parcels for projects of 10 or fewer units on multifamily-zoned lots no larger than 5 acres substantially surrounded by qualified urban uses.
  • Project standards. Required minimum parcel size and density requirements, exempted projects from certain minimum parcel size and dimension and homeowners' association requirements, and required ministerial review of the housing project itself.
  • Local limits. Allowed objective zoning, subdivision, and design standards but prohibited those that physically preclude specified densities, apply solely because of approval under the bill, or impose certain parking, setback, or floor area ratio requirements.
  • 60-day decision. Required approval or denial within 60 days of a complete application, deemed approval if no action is taken, and written comments explaining deficiencies upon denial.
  • Building permits. Required issuance of building permits before final map recordation for qualifying applicants with tentative or parcel map approval and a complete permit application, with an optional recorded covenant condition.
  • ADUs and SB 9. Did not require ADUs, JADUs, or urban lot splits on parcels created under the bill, and exempted specified horsekeeping zones from SB 9 provisions where the housing element is compliant (operative January 1, 2024).
  • CEQA and dates. Expanded the CEQA ministerial exemption, exempted implementing ordinances from CEQA, and made most provisions operative July 1, 2024.

Paraphrased from the Legislative Counsel’s Digest. Check the bill text before relying on it.

ClaudeGreen text is a summary heading written by Claude to help navigate. It is not statute text; the statute text is in black.

Preamble

SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

(a) California has a statewide housing crisis, represented by a shortage of nearly 3,500,000 homes.

(b) California’s housing crisis stifles economic growth, contributes to the homelessness epidemic, consumes an ever-growing share of the paychecks of working families, and holds millions of households back from realizing the California dream of home ownership.

(c) Restrictive zoning, land use, and burdensome permitting policies at the local and state level are a major cause of the shortfall between California’s housing needs and the available supply of housing.

(d) Home ownership is still the primary way in which most Americans build wealth and assets. California has the third-highest median home price in the country and the high cost of housing has pushed what was once a modest goal further and further out of reach for most people of color.

(e) Home ownership rates in California are among the lowest nationwide, and in recent years those numbers have continued downward. Between 2020 and 2022, California home ownership declined by 3.19 percent.

(f) While the home ownership gap is an issue throughout the country, the rate of African American and Latinx home ownership is significantly worse in California. At a national level, African Americans and Latinx have a home ownership rate of 42 percent and 47 percent, respectively, while here in California, that rate drops down to 35 percent and 42 percent, respectively.

(g) The Legislative Analyst’s Office has identified a lack of housing supply as one of the culprits for the severe home ownership gap. The office’s 2016 housing affordability report found that “the state’s housing shortage also makes many Californians, not only low-income residents, more likely to commute longer distances, live in overcrowded housing, and delay or forgo home ownership.”

(h) According to the Urban Institute, multifamily construction built for sale accounted for only 5.4 percent of all multifamily starts and only 2.7 percent of all single-family and multifamily home construction for the first three quarters of 2021.

(i) Houses cost more in California due to increased costs, heavy regulatory hurdles, and mandatory features and fees that add tens of thousands of dollars to the cost of each unit.

(j) Access to sustainable home ownership can be expanded with fiscal assistance, housing counseling, sound lending, flexible underwriting that ensures the ability to pay, and backing by Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage insurance.

(k) As production has slowed and changed, for-sale inventory has tightened, particularly for entry-level homes.

(l) Higher home prices have translated to less diversity in who is able to purchase a home.

(m) Home ownership is a powerful tool to close the racial and ethnic wealth gap across the State of California and nationwide.

(n) The production of new market-rate housing frees up existing, more affordable elsewhere in the region for sale or rent to middle and lower-income households.

SEC. 2In the navigator:§ 65852.28changes

Section 65852.28 is added to the Government Code, to read:

SEC. 3In the navigator:§ 65913.4.5changes

Section 65913.4.5 is added to the Government Code, to read:

SEC. 4In the navigator:§ 66499.41changes

Section 66499.41 is added to the Government Code, to read:

SEC. 5

The Legislature finds and declares that the state faces a severe housing shortage, largely due to the lack of available housing affordable to lower and moderate-income families. By expanding opportunities for ownership of more affordable housing types on smaller, less expensive parcels, this act ensures access to affordable housing and addresses a matter of statewide concern, rather than a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, Section 2 of this act amending Section 65585 of the Government Code and Sections 3, 4, and 5 of this act adding Sections 65852.28, 65913.4.5, and 66499.41 to the Government Code apply to all cities, including charter cities.

SEC. 6. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.

Source: LegiScan API, chaptered text of SB 684 (2023-2024 Session).

Bill text is the chaptered version from LegiScan (California Legislature); spacing is normalized. Code section text in a bill is the text that bill chaptered, not necessarily the law in effect today. Not legal advice.